![]() The participants will receive a flash drive with Excel templates that include formulas, as well as completed sheets with sample data, and the presentation files. We will also include discussions about the criteria and ways of eliciting honest and useful feedback from librarians and patrons. We will cover some technical aspects of gathering and analyzing data, including using Excel functions. The steps covered will include selecting and defining the criteria, gathering and analyzing the data, and determining how to make final decisions. The workshop leaders will first demonstrate each step of our process, and then the participants will work in small groups (5-7) using their own experiences and a sample data set of their own. In this day-long workshop, we will walk through the process using the Decision Grid process developed by at the University of Maryland at College Park (Foudy and McManus 533-538) as a starting point. How would you do it? In response to a cut to our materials budget, we have developed a method that condenses a large amount of information into a few select criteria. There will be a time when your library will need to evaluate all of your electronic resources. Participants are asked to bring laptops installed with MS Office, as they will be supplied with the appropriate title lists and create their own Access database for content analysis during the tutorials. The focus will be on merging content offered by the same vendor and on holdings coverage and overlap, and an example will be made of alumni access databases offered by three different vendors whose content had to be analyzed to make a purchase decision. In a series of tightly focused tutorials, this pre-conference will instruct participants in creating an MS Access database from start to finish using actual vendor title and holdings lists and in designing the appropriate queries to compare title and holdings content of multiple vendors. In this same regard, Serials Solutions’ Overlap Analysis falls short also. However, these tools are limited by the very limited number of databases they compare and by their inability to combine content of the same vendor to analyze it against content provided by another vendor. There are a couple well-known tools available to compare database titles for an institution. Librarians who have implemented the Ithaka S+R Local Survey(s) are welcome to bring their results to the discussion. Participants will benefit from this workshop by improving their ability to incorporate evidence into decision-making processes about collections and collecting. Time to begin formulating institutional plans for structuring evidence-based decision-making processes on these issues.Group review of participants' institution-level data, including what is useful and what is missing and. ![]() Group discussion of strategies for incorporating evidence most effectively into institutional decision-making on these topics.An overview of national-level data that help to contextualize this issue and frame some of the key issues that individual institutions may wish to consider.The workshop format will include the following components: Participants will be encouraged to bring their own data pertaining to their college or university, such as collections usage, survey findings, and budget documents, for group discussion. This session will cover the format transitions for current collecting as well as collections management, especially for monographs and other books. Ithaka S+R is hosting a workshop to help academic and research libraries make more evidence-based decisions about their collecting and collections. Cost = $175, reduced to $100 for Ithaka S+R Local Survey participants. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |